Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Plummz
You have a bizarre anti-American theology.

If despising a marxist pretender is anti-American, so be it.

On the other hand, you apparently have no grasp on reality.

Remember, like most FReepers (I can't speak for you, of course), I would LOVE to find that Ø is not qualified for his office. I would thoroughly enjoy seeing him run out on a rail. I would love to see him being confronted by his masters (e.g., Soros) for not fulfilling his portion of the contract.

Unfortunately, I am also part of a smaller subset of FReepers: those of us who recognize that the 111th Congress won't take any action against him, even if he unequivocally admits to High Treason on nationwide television. I also recognize that the courts to date haven't been willing to touch this case with a 10 foot pole and, with the impending inclusion of Sonia Sotomayor on the SCOTUS, the likelihood of the courts being willing to touch this case get smaller and smaller. How many cases to date have been summarily dismissed?

So, I am in this exclusive club of FReepers who happen to have the belief that the only way that he's going to be run out on a rail is some point in time AFTER January 3, 2011. And the only way that this is going to happen is if a HUGE majority of the American people recognize and are outraged by this scandal (whether the scandal is something he's hiding on an original Hawaii Birth Certificate or the fraud around an original Mombasa Birth Certificate).

See, unlike you, I recognize that most Americans will get really bored with complex conspiracy webs that would make Alex Jones' head spin, like some that I've read on this very site.

Unlike you, I want to keep it simple stupid. I KNOW that Bambi won't release his B.C. And if you're honest, you will know that, as well. At some point in time, some leftist media type will actually read the Immigration Law (maybe a consultant will tell him to do so). AND if that is happens, we'd better be prepared to show that she hasn't met the residency requirements to maternally pass on citizenship to THE ONE®™. But, of course, I wouldn't expect you to think about it, concentrating, rather, on minutiae involving the photoshopped COLB.

One other thing that I'd wonder is if at least one of the summary dismissals was based upon a belief that it wouldn't matter anyway (the judge thinking to himself, "after all, he'd inherit citizenship by birth from his mother, no matter where he was born, so why should I have to deal with this ugliness").

But rather than trying to strategically think a couple of moves ahead, in order to prevent your opponent from triangulating, you'd rather just hurl slimeball attacks…just like a libtard.

Well, I guess it's your choice to either act like an adult or act like a KosKid. As long as the management of this place doesn't mind, it's cool with me.

So, press on.

119 posted on 07/24/2009 12:53:03 PM PDT by markomalley (Extra Ecclesiam nulla salus)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 117 | View Replies ]


To: markomalley
Your bizarre theology concedes to Barry by giving the Congress the magical power to redefine words. I agree the COLB photoshop is a a side issue conspiracy theory. What we have here is a simple legal question. You are stuck in the other side issue, which conflates and confuses birthright citizenship and natural-born citizenship with a series of complex "legal" arguments which are irrelevant to the simple prima facie case for Barry's ineligibility due to his status as a natural-born British subject. Your anti-American attitude vis-a-vis the intent of the Founding documents allows later generations to "define" the Constituion anyway they want, i.e. changing the document without going through the formal amendment process. This anti-American philosophy would render the simple legal question moot. You are setting the table for the 111th Congress, which you claim not to trust, to "define" natural-born in such a way to make Barry eligible. Those are unConstitutional bills yet you are endorsing the Congress' ability to pass them as "law." If you are thinking strategically, a few moves ahead, you should know that your complex anti-Constitution anti-American legal philosophy virtually concedes the game to Barry before it starts. Hope this helps.
120 posted on 07/24/2009 2:17:53 PM PDT by Plummz (pro-constitution, anti-corruption)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 119 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson