Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: markomalley

The Constitution does not define the term “navy.”

According to your bizarre theory, the Congress could redefine “navy” to mean “lollipops.”

You are in la-la land. A natural-born British subject like Barry just ain’t ne c’est pas un naturel ou indigene...


104 posted on 07/23/2009 9:55:56 PM PDT by Plummz (pro-constitution, anti-corruption)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies ]


To: Plummz
You are in la-la land. A natural-born British subject like Barry just ain’t ne c’est pas un naturel ou indigene...

Thank you for your well thought out and reasoned post.

110 posted on 07/24/2009 3:20:17 AM PDT by markomalley (Extra Ecclesiam nulla salus)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 104 | View Replies ]

To: Plummz
According to your bizarre theory, the Congress could redefine “navy” to mean “lollipops.”

Oh, and by the way, Congress did define the term "Navy:"

(1) The term “Navy” means the United States Navy. It includes the Regular Navy, the Fleet Reserve, and the Navy Reserve.

(2) The term “Marine Corps” means the United States Marine Corps. It includes the Regular Marine Corps, the Fleet Marine Corps Reserve, and the Marine Corps Reserve.

(3) The term “member of the naval service” means a person appointed or enlisted in, or inducted or conscripted into, the Navy or the Marine Corps.

Silly, ain't it?

111 posted on 07/24/2009 3:30:34 AM PDT by markomalley (Extra Ecclesiam nulla salus)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 104 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson