How so? How do you see it that way?
So far, all it seems that the global warming debate is about is politics and grant money. Good grief, they even gave Al Gore a Nobel Prize for his work in climatology.
What a slap in the face for meteorologists and climatologists worldwide.
“government grant money in politics.”
I meant grant money in SCIENCE...my bad.
The global warming debate has been decisively turned by actual data, and revisiting the fraudulent data (in part) of the past.
The politics has even changed, using “global climate change” as the operative phrase.
There really is little argument in science about “global warming”, the politicians haven’t caught up yet, though.