No, it can’t be a lizard, or dino, or rodent - not if the words have any meaning.
Why would it be sheer arrogance for someone who has studied bones of various animals all their life to believe that they have more knowledge than most of what the bones of certain animals look like? Wouldn’t the sheer arrogance belong to someone who hasn’t done any such study and yet believes that they know as much as people who have?
It would hardly be astounding arrogance for a plumber with years of experience to believe that he knows more about plumbing than most. It would be astounding arrogance for me who hasn’t spent a second on plumbing work to think I know as much as plumbers.
Silly science defender. Years of study and hands-on experience count for nothing compared to what you can see in a 460-pixel photo on a website.
I've wondered before if any of the anti-evolutionists here do anything themselves that requires training or expertise, because they seem so quick to discount it in science.