Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: thulldud
But the fact is that while being 18 means you can hold a gun and shoot it where you are told, it does not follow that you have the capability to judge what should be shot at.
Btw, the draft ended about that same time, but the voting age was lowered anyway

I would like to raise the age but you are wrong on both counts. GIs between the ages of 17 to 21 have a lot of responsibility and for some of them the judgement required of them will be higher than what they encounter in their civilian jobs during the rest of their life.

The draft ended almost two years after the voting age change.

27 posted on 07/21/2009 8:49:45 AM PDT by ansel12 (Romney (guns)"instruments of destruction with the sole purpose of hunting down and killing people")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies ]


To: ansel12

I am not wrong. If the voting age had been changed only for military veterans, then you would have a point. But that was not the goal.


29 posted on 07/21/2009 1:13:28 PM PDT by thulldud (It HAS happened here!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 27 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson