"... you dont even have a name attached or a cite or a source."
Bwahahahaha, have you ever read all the way through it, fool? Notice anything resembling an html addy at the end?
I really find you persistent lying to be off putting. But then, that is part of the Alinsky wsay don'tchaknow. Lying is just like breathing for your ilk.
Sorry, by cite or a source I meant a court case where this line of argument was argued, not just a blog post.
For example, this is a citation, in the SCOTUS Kim ruling:
“In U. S. v. Rhodes (1866), Mr. Justice Swayne, sitting in the circuit court, said: ‘All persons born in the allegiance of the king are natural- born subjects, and all persons born in the allegiance of the United States are natural-born citizens. Birth and allegiance go together. Such is the rule of the common law, and it is the common law of this country, as well as of England.’ ‘We find no warrant for the opinion that this great principle of the common law has ever been changed in the United States. It has always obtained here with the same vigor, and subject only to the same exceptions, since as before the Revolution.’” United States v. Wong Kim Ark, 169 U.S. 649, 662-663 [cit. omitted.]