[erkyl]

Maybe you should pull your head out next and learn to read.I did explain things to you in as simple a way I could hoping you would understand but I guess I couldn’t make it simple enough.

Oh, ad hominem attacks--a typical strategy of those who have no legitimate argument. If you will note in my comments, prior to yours, I was discussing the failure of conservatives to vote for a "RINO" because they aren't happy with 100% of the candidate's positions. I wasn't talking about McCain's inability to persuade swing voters and undecideds. You're the one who mis-characterized my line of reasoning. Now, who needs to learn to read and follow along?

[Eaker]

Now, who needs to learn to read and follow along?

That would be you as nothing has changed as you think pissing off conservatives is a sensible tactic to getting them on your side.

Every time you post that someone who didn't vote for Odinga elected him or say how they voted when you were not in the booth is an ad hominem attack and a damn lie.

Everyone can see it and you fools spouting this crap are fooling only yourselves.

[Eaker]

I was discussing the failure of conservatives to vote for a "RINO" because they aren't happy with 100% of the candidate's positions.

How can you expect anyone to vote for someone who you do not agree with 100% of the time?

Is this what you really meant?