The fact that I have issues with Orly Taitz has nothing to do with this post. However, since you brought it up. Orly Taitz still claims in her legal filings with every lawsuit that Obama traveled to Pakistan in 1981 when Pakisan was on a U.S. State Department "no travel" list. That is patently false, yet she refuses to remove the assertion. It makes her look foolish and does damage to our objective because the defense has only to point out that error to the judge for him/her to question Taitz's competence as an attorney.
I always point out false claims regarding the natural-born citizen issue when it is necessary. Doing so does not make me an anti-birther or a troll. The false claims serve as a tool to destroy the entire foundation of our arguments. Because if we're errant in two or three assertions, it is easy for others to dismiss all of our assertions. While I don't enjoy the heated arguments or the being labeled as a "troll" by some fellow birthers, I believe it's important enought that I'm willing to put up with the crap.
I'm very sorry that you're offended by my aversion to some of Orly's tactics. We have a difference of opinion where she is concerned. You may not realize it or accept it, but we're on the same side.
I’m reading your comments as public relations for Obama. The Democrats and media are terrified of Orly Taitz because she is effective and has a case.