[GodGunsGuts]

==When I read about this in a reputable peer-reviewed scientific report, I’ll believe.

Evolution and reputable do not sit well in the same sentence. However, the Temple of Darwin journal citation is linked in the review:

http://www3.interscience.wiley.com/journal/122462698/abstract?CRETRY=1&SRETRY=0

[GAB-1955]

That’s the press release, not the scientific journal reference. Do you happen to have that?

[katlynne11]

They argue that the published studies lack objectivity and have embedded tautologies.

[Texas Songwriter]

. They argue that the published studies lack objectivity and have embedded tautologies.

This is an honest statement by these who published who wrote this report.