Kindly indicate what, exactly, I said which you find so objectionable.
Nothing I wrote advocated such behavior. I merely observed the impotence of what didn’t work before and won’t work again.
You said:
“The Founding Fathers thought tar-and-feathers were a perfectly reasonable starting point. Today, we’re too scared to even go that far. “
Then you said:
“Nothing I wrote advocated such behavior.”
Are you advocating tar-and-feathers, or do you agree that we should NOT go that far and that violence against anyone in America is WRONG?
“I merely observed the impotence of what didn’t work before and won’t work again.”
Maybe a lecture on the impotence of violence in recent decades is in order as well then. Don’t you agree?