Melas,
What do you think would happen if Jim ever supported violence?
If you are smart you know where this ends...history has made this painfully clear. You can NEVER advocate violence because the police state would never allow it.
I am not saying the underlying process that Jim has proposed has violence as part of it however as I said earlier history is clear. It is unfortunate and I pray that we never see the day but this ultimately ends in a form of civil war - just look at ACORN to see what we are in for.
We need to be able to have frank discussions but unfortunately there are people that are selling our country out and we need to be smart about dealing with them.
Instant crackdown on FR?
If you are smart you know where this ends...history has made this painfully clear. You can NEVER advocate violence because the police state would never allow it.
Why do you thing I'm so against it in the first place? I know exactly how this begins, plays out, and end. It starts with a good guy like Jim with great intentions. He gets the ball rolling, it gains momentum and builds. However, under the surface more violent personalities are at work, and before you know it they're in charge, and Jim's out in the cold. It ends with lots of innocent blood in the streets. Is that really what you want? American against American, brother against brother? We've done it before and it was ugly enough with weapons that were primitive by today's standards. Surely you do not want to go there.