Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Episcopal Bishops Can Bless Gay Unions
Washington Post ^ | July 18, 2009 | William Wan

Posted on 07/18/2009 10:55:00 AM PDT by Zakeet

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-23 last
To: Buck W.
You find it odd that all Episcopalians are Christians? I find that odd..

You really believe a name, a few rituals and a building have bestowed salvation upon you, don't you?

That's sort of pagan, Forrest.

21 posted on 07/18/2009 1:42:57 PM PDT by RegulatorCountry
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies]

To: TexasFreeper2009
A memorable passage from my 1963 copy of Medieval History by Norman Cantor:

"If not a cause of social malaise, homosexuality is symptomatic of some deep-rooted malfunctioning of the social and moral order. It is worth noting that in two other societies (in addition to the late Roman Empire) that exhibited quite rapid declines, the medieval Arabic and the twentieth century English homosexuality flourished in the ruling class."

I won't live long enough to witness how history will regard our current era. I hope that honest historians will record how the Left murdered Western Civilization and Christianity.

22 posted on 07/18/2009 1:54:58 PM PDT by Jacquerie (We are in a civil war. The rats are winning.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Zakeet

Their signs are evasive in that they list what they’re really after last...that is, they want to force Americans to respect homosexuality. Sorry, won’t respect sin, rather it’s homosexuality, theft, murder lies or anything else and no amount of laws is going to change that. And the whole argument is fallacious anyway...there is NO right to marriage. A heterosexual person can’t marry someone of the same sex, just as a homosexual person can’t...no difference in treatment under the law. And if the return argument is that heterosexuals can marry who they want that is also false. They can not marry an under age person, they can not marry a close relative etc. So the entire “rights” argument is specious.


23 posted on 07/18/2009 2:00:37 PM PDT by highlander_UW
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-23 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson