Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: jazusamo
These aren't really "wild horses". In fact, about 4,000 years ago your typical captive horse, or even a wild one, wasn't big enough to carry a rider.

At some point the ancients began controlled breeding to get larger horses. Finally, they developed horses that could carry a rider, saddle and a small load. No longer were warriors limited to horseteams and chariots.

For all practical purposes these are DOMESTICTED LIVESTOCK, and they should be dealt with the same way we handle cattle, sheep, goats, chickens and turkeys.

If the "wild horse" fans can come up with some authentic but "small" wild horses, I suppose they could be turned loose and we could pretend they were really "wild" animals, but any horse big enough for a man to ride is not a "wild horse" and hasn't been for the last 3,500 years.

50 posted on 07/18/2009 12:27:53 PM PDT by muawiyah
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 47 | View Replies ]


To: muawiyah

I couldn’t agree more. Though they are referred to as “wild” horses they are descendants of domesticated horses turned loose.


53 posted on 07/18/2009 12:40:26 PM PDT by jazusamo (But there really is no free lunch, except in the world of political rhetoric,.: Thomas Sowell)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 50 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson