Skip to comments.
Court sets release of Ryan's divorce file; Judge admits son will be harmed (Flashback)
Chicago Tribune ^
| June 18, 2004
| Michael Martinez and Rick Pearson
Posted on 07/17/2009 10:24:14 PM PDT by Red Steel
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41 next last
The Ryan case provides precedence to justify opening Obama's hidden records that he has shielded from the public if and when a case against Obama will be heard on its merits. Just rewards; turn around is fair play and all. :-)
1
posted on
07/17/2009 10:24:15 PM PDT
by
Red Steel
To: BP2; real_patriotic_american; patriot08
Ping. You guys are plugged in. Ammo you can use at the right time.
2
posted on
07/17/2009 10:26:05 PM PDT
by
Red Steel
To: LucyT; pissant; Polarik
To: Red Steel
4
posted on
07/17/2009 10:27:56 PM PDT
by
kalee
(01/20/13 The end of an error.... Obama even worse than Carter.)
To: Red Steel
The justification that the judge cited in this case are not that high ....
5
posted on
07/17/2009 10:28:06 PM PDT
by
Red Steel
To: Jet Jaguar
Worth a try. Oh, the irony. It wouldn't happen to a "better guy" than Obama. ;-)
6
posted on
07/17/2009 10:38:11 PM PDT
by
Red Steel
To: Red Steel
What kind of judge would intentionally hurt a child?
7
posted on
07/17/2009 10:41:30 PM PDT
by
freekitty
(Give me back my conservative vote.)
To: Jet Jaguar; Red Steel; Fred Nerks; null and void; stockpirate; george76; PhilDragoo; Candor7; ...
Dealing a blow to the U.S. Senate candidacy of Republican Jack Ryan, a California judge ruled that several sealed divorce records likely to embarrass the candidate and his ex-wife should be opened to the public. Jack Ryan is a Republican; different rules doncha' know.
Pinging anyway...
8
posted on
07/17/2009 10:41:44 PM PDT
by
LucyT
To: freekitty
This judge explicitly say that the public has the right to know over the child's welfare.
What kind of judge would intentionally hurt a child?
That would be a democrat party judge in this case.
9
posted on
07/17/2009 10:46:04 PM PDT
by
Red Steel
To: Red Steel
10
posted on
07/17/2009 10:53:39 PM PDT
by
Eagles6
( Typical White Guy: Christian, Constitutionalist, Heterosexual, Redneck. (Let them eat arugula!))
To: Red Steel; penelopesire; seekthetruth; television is just wrong; jcsjcm; BP2; Pablo Mac; ...
That judge was despicable ... probably
part of the “Chicago Swamp Machine.”
And he helped pave the way for the
downfall of our wonderful America.
11
posted on
07/17/2009 10:58:22 PM PDT
by
STARWISE
(The Art & Science Institute of Chicago Politics NE Div: now open at the White House)
To: STARWISE
Jack Ryan is a friend of my family. A very good man. His son was teased like heck after this.
12
posted on
07/17/2009 11:01:12 PM PDT
by
rexgrossmansonlyfan
(Obama, Blagojevich, Stroger and Daley when Daley is the least corrupt of a group you have issues!)
To: Red Steel
Great posted article. We should never forget what Obama and his crew did, that included getting Blair Hull's divorce records released, Obama's primary opponent. The Tribune admitted that Axelrod and Obama's campaign were behind the push to get the records released.
The hypocrisy of blocking the release of a $10 birth certificate is mind boggling. This country, its politics and the media are a shadow of it's former self.
13
posted on
07/17/2009 11:06:51 PM PDT
by
FTJM
To: Red Steel
And what did the Republicans do? Assemble the circular firing squad.
Seriously, we gotta get past that sex thing. It hurts our party more than it hurts the Dhimmies.
14
posted on
07/17/2009 11:10:24 PM PDT
by
Selmore
(The torch of liberty is hot.It warms those who hold it high.It burns those who try to extinguish it.)
To: Red Steel
Meanwhile the Obama Regime spends millions to hide the Manchurian Candidate’s $10 birth certificate.
To: LucyT
Wasn’t this a few years ago?
Now, I will go read the post for better understanding.
16
posted on
07/18/2009 12:26:54 AM PDT
by
Vendome
(Don't take life so seriously... You'll never live through it.)
To: LucyT
Without reading the thread I guess you feel what’s good for the goose is good for the gander.
I agree. But how? On that basis? I wish.
17
posted on
07/18/2009 12:28:56 AM PDT
by
Vendome
(Don't take life so seriously... You'll never live through it.)
To: rexgrossmansonlyfan
Jack Ryan is a friend of my family. A very good man. His son was teased like heck after this.
Sorry to hear that. Sometimes I wonder what if....if Jack had not dropped out of race, etc. Very sad—for country and sad for his children.
18
posted on
07/18/2009 12:30:37 AM PDT
by
Freedom56v2
("If you think healthcare is expensive now, just wait till it is free! "~ PJ O'Rourke)
To: rexgrossmansonlyfan
I’m sorry to hear about his son. But wouldn’t it have been easy for Jeri Ryan to divorce her husband without dragging him through the mud?
To: TheThinker
Jeri didn’t drag him through the mud publicly. It was a matter she raised in a sealed family court case. It was David Axelrod’s friends at the Chicago Tribune who sued to get the records unsealed... osme judge went along with it of course...
20
posted on
07/18/2009 12:57:04 AM PDT
by
Plummz
(pro-constitution, anti-corruption)
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson