Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: OafOfOffice

Anyone have any doubts obama wants euthanasia? These are tweets I just received from Major garrett FOX NEWS white house correspondent on Obama’s health care day at ABC.

Obama wants a expert on end of life treatments. Similar to Oregon and Washingtons physician assisted suicide instead of paying for medical treatments?

If obama gets a expert like he did for climate change, (ignoring all scientific results because it went against their agenda or the expert saying valley farmers cannot have water because of non endangered smelt) we are all doomed to soylent green Obama medical care.

Argh! Misfire. Obama sez in last tweet. Obama does want “expert” advice on end-of-life treatment. Whose expert? Unclear

Obama talked AA ystrdy re smoking. 2nite a new AA: “Adequate,affordable”

Very serious Q: does joy/quality of life count vs cost-effectiveness? Huge end-of life issue.

“we don’t want you to have to change” your health care, Obama says. New take on old promise “you get to keep” what you like

Obama talked AA ystrdy re smoking. 2nite a new AA: “Adequate,affordable”

Part of Obama answer re: capacity - new plan phased in (won’t say how slow/fast) and new incentives for primary care sted specializing

Obama talked AA ystrdy re smoking. 2nite a new AA: “Adequate,affordable”

Obama; lack of necessary docs/nurses for potential load of 46 mil patients “significant issue”

HC capacity inadequate, Obama says, for primary care. Will take “years” to remedy.21

Obama talked AA ystrdy re smoking. 2nite a new AA: “Adequate,affordable”


447 posted on 07/18/2009 12:29:31 PM PDT by OafOfOffice (Constitution is not neutral.It was designed to take the government off the backs of people-Douglas)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 445 | View Replies ]


To: OafOfOffice

http://online.wsj.com/article/SB124597492337757443.html#mod=rss_opinion_main

Rationing, and not only withholding care from the elderly.
President Obama’s TV health-care forum on Wednesday evening was useful, because revealing. Namely, Mr. Obama shared more than he probably intended about the kind of rationing that his health plan will inevitably impose.
At one point in the town hall, broadcast from the East Room by ABC news, a woman named Jane Sturm told the story of her 105-year-old mother, who, at 100, was told by an arrhythmia specialist that she was too old for a pacemaker. She ended up getting a second option, and the operation, for which Ms. Sturm credits her survival.

“Look, the first thing for all of us to understand that is we actually have some — some choices to make about how we want to deal with our own end-of-life care,” Mr. Obama replied. After discussing ways “we as a culture and as a society [can start] to make better decisions within our own families and for ourselves,” he continued that in general “at least we can let doctors know and your mom know that, you know what? Maybe this isn’t going to help. Maybe you’re better off not having the surgery, but taking the painkiller.”

What Mr. Obama is describing is his preferred health-care future. If or when the Administration’s speculative cost-cutting measures under universal health care fail to produce savings, government will start explicitly limiting patient access to treatments and services regarded as too expensive. Democrats deny this eventuality, but health planners will have no choice, given that the current entitlement system is already barreling toward insolvency without adding millions of new people to the federal balance sheet.

Earlier, a physician asked Mr. Obama if he would subject his own family to the restrictions of a national health plan, even if specialists recommended treatments that weren’t covered. The President was noncommittal: “And you’re absolutely right that, if it’s my family member, if it’s my wife, if it’s my children, if it’s my grandmother, I always want them to get the very best care.” We suspect most Americans would agree.


448 posted on 07/18/2009 12:32:38 PM PDT by OafOfOffice (Constitution is not neutral.It was designed to take the government off the backs of people-Douglas)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 447 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson