Posted on 07/17/2009 7:09:31 PM PDT by Jim Robinson
Jim Thompson for POTUS!
Your loss of coverage Grampa Dave will mean more coverage for illegals. I'm also guessing that the poor will get increased coverage.
Wealth redistribution is upon us, even if it kills us.
Suck it up Grandpa Dave. Happy pills, ya know the ones that make you say "who cares", will probably be covered.
Count me in.
So is his brother, FRED!!
Hopefully by now, everyone is aware that the dimocrats slipped FOCA into this ugly bill too.
**Freedom of Choice Act - Declares that it is the policy of the United States that every woman has the fundamental right to choose to: (1) bear a child; (2) terminate a pregnancy prior to fetal viability; or (3) terminate a pregnancy after fetal viability when necessary to protect her life or her health.**
Quote from the original bill.
BTTT! Count me in, Sir!
I’m Sparticus.
If enough of us will not quit our jobs because we have to eat and have a roof over our heads and enough of us won’t raise our dependents to 10 on our w-4s and enough of us won’t march or disrupt traffic and business as usual in D.C. then the armed will wait in place until the ultimate fall.
Why wait until he has put us all out of work and taken away our health care?
Some place like federal prison once it's found that he's constitutionally unfit for office?
/fingers crossed/
*
Outstanding!
Count me in.
If we are truly serious about this then, Romney, McCain, Pawlenty, Lindsey Graham et al had best be run out of the party and some of those never to contend for the White House
Heaven above Jim! God bless you I love it! Thank you for taking these worms to task!
|
All armed men to DC when?
Long time lurker - first time poster...
I’m ready to join the fight to regain our liberty
Totally agree.
Glad to see you posting. It’s now or never for this fight.
I would suggest everyone read “Rules for Radicals” by Saul Alinsky. It’s the playbook of the Left, and Obama has perfected it’s use. Know your enemy — then, adopt HIS tactics and turn them around on him.
Why not protests at the offices of Senators and Representatives? Why not a march on Washington (like on 9/12)? Why not sit-ins at Federal offices around the country? Why not disruptions of “government activities” geared toward implementing the TARP bailouts, or the corporate takeovers, or the government/banking alliances, or the Obamacare plan for socialized medicine?
These actions don’t have to be “violent,” though we can EXPECT to be treated violently, to be mischaracterized, persecuted and prosecuted. We won’t be held up as heroes as were the Civil Rights activists or anti-war protestors of the 1960’s by “Uncle Walter.” And, should we judge it necessary, are we WILLING to sit in a jail for our principles and convictions?
These means of expression and resistance could potentially head off the necessity for my violent forms of resistance later. They are certainly worth a try — and they have worked over time for our enemies. It would be nice to turn them back on the Statists....
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.