[ctdonath2]

A correct analysis; however, it is merely a 1/9th minority opinion - suggestive and informative, but not binding. The majority ruling of that case said in essence "there is absolutely no sane connection between geographic private possession of a product and the 'commerce clause'", as in "the sun rises in the east, therefore I shall have oatmeal for breakfast." Raich is binding and relevant.

[Idabilly]

Our Constitutional Rights have become {Void WHERE prohibited by Law} It's time for elected officials {Local,State and Tribal} to nullify Unconstitutional Laws and Respect the Bill of Rights!

To the Garbage with ‘case law’ my Rights are unalienable

"We hold these truths to be self-evident, that all men are created equal, that they are endowed by their Creator with certain unalienable Rights, that among these are Life, Liberty and the pursuit of Happiness." “The powers not delegated to the United States by the Constitution, nor prohibited by it to the states, are reserved to the states respectively, or to the people”

“The powers delegated by the proposed Constitution to the federal government are few and defined. Those which are to remain in the State governments are numerous and indefinite. The former will be exercised principally on external objects, as war, peace, negotiation and foreign commerce. ... The powers reserved to the several States will extend to all the objects which in the ordinary course of affairs, concern the lives and liberties, and properties of the people, and the internal order, improvement and prosperity of the State.”
Federalist Paper No. 45.