Uh, can we get some objective evidence of this assertion?
You said — Uh, can we get some objective evidence of this assertion?
—
No need of objective evidence for this assertion. It’s false — “inherently” — on the face of it.
It’s only *running the red light* that results in “law enforcement action” — and thus any law enforcement action has already demonstrated that something very unsafe happened.
HOWEVER, if *no law enforcement action* takes place (with a “warning” that a camera is there), then it’s obvious that something “very safe” has happened.
Hence, the statement is *false* right on the face of it... LOL...