Skip to comments.
Police chief denounces 'cowardly' iPhone users monitoring speed traps
The Washington Examiner.com ^
| July 7, 2009
| Hayley Peterson
Posted on 07/17/2009 5:29:04 PM PDT by RoadKingSE
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-31 last
To: Paladin2
You said — Uh, can we get some objective evidence of this assertion?
—
No need of objective evidence for this assertion. It’s false — “inherently” — on the face of it.
It’s only *running the red light* that results in “law enforcement action” — and thus any law enforcement action has already demonstrated that something very unsafe happened.
HOWEVER, if *no law enforcement action* takes place (with a “warning” that a camera is there), then it’s obvious that something “very safe” has happened.
Hence, the statement is *false* right on the face of it... LOL...
21
posted on
07/17/2009 7:30:40 PM PDT
by
Star Traveler
(The God of Abraham, Isaac and Jacob is a Zionist and Jerusalem is the apple of His eye.)
To: Swordmaker
Another very *fine use* for the iPhone...
I’m pleased that Apple is contributing to the *safety* of the driving public, along with the inventive programmer of that piece of software... :-)
22
posted on
07/17/2009 7:32:27 PM PDT
by
Star Traveler
(The God of Abraham, Isaac and Jacob is a Zionist and Jerusalem is the apple of His eye.)
To: RoadKingSE
Oh honey your just pissed you may lose out on the money from your check points and speed traps.Nothing more.
23
posted on
07/17/2009 7:47:20 PM PDT
by
HANG THE EXPENSE
(I am Jim Thompson,Life is tough.It's even tougher when you're stupid.)
To: RoadKingSE
I love cops but sometimes they forget who works for who.
And most government employees forget that one of the main things people want is to be able to go about their business without being bugged by government functionaries.
Protect us from the bad guys, keep the streets paved, and otherwise, leave us alone. We have things to do.
24
posted on
07/17/2009 8:11:45 PM PDT
by
marron
To: Swordmaker
25
posted on
07/17/2009 8:15:44 PM PDT
by
doc11355
To: RoadKingSE
>> Lanier said the technology is a “cowardly tactic”
That statement blows me away. Cowardly? Like “cops ‘n speeders” is a sporting event and citizens are somehow cheating??!?
So Barbie, what would be *courageous*? Running a red light in front of a camera, middle finger in the air? Maybe broadsiding a police cruiser? What?
Dumb b!tch.
26
posted on
07/17/2009 8:19:44 PM PDT
by
Nervous Tick
(Stop dissing drunken sailors! At least they spend their OWN money.)
To: parsifal
in some jurisdictions, that can earn you a ticket as well.
27
posted on
07/17/2009 9:28:22 PM PDT
by
balch3
To: RoadKingSE
More and more it's looking like it is them against us. They're really not here to serve and protect us. They're here to keep us in line and generate revenue for themselves.
In the true spirit of our tea party forefathers, we need to resist. I've often fantasized about taking out those traffic cameras by decorating their lens screens with some spray paint or a few well placed rounds from a paint ball gun.
28
posted on
07/19/2009 12:53:43 AM PDT
by
Teotwawki
(Obama was right about one thing, I am clinging to my Bible and my gun.)
To: doc11355
How do you get WiFi in your car when you’re moving? If Trapster does that, I will gladly download it.
To: Teotwawki
I've often fantasized about taking out those traffic cameras by decorating their lens screens with some spray paint or a few well placed rounds from a paint ball gun.This looks like a job for Carl Spackler.
30
posted on
07/19/2009 6:12:02 AM PDT
by
RoadKingSE
(How do you know that the light at the end of the tunnel isn't a muzzle flash ?)
To: RoadKingSE
I've often fantasized about taking out those traffic cameras by decorating their lens screens with some spray paint or a few well placed rounds from a paint ball gun.
No, either of those would be readily detectable. You need to put a fresnel lens over the light source for the flash. To anyone standing there looking at the flash, it would appear to be functioning but the lens would diffuse the light enough that it wouldn't be sufficient to illuminate the license plate at a distance.
31
posted on
07/19/2009 6:26:49 AM PDT
by
aruanan
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-31 last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson