The algoresque curricula simply LIE about the scientific status of this debate. In fact this is a very close analogue to creationism. algoresque global warming propaganda has been inserted into curricula by politically motivated activists rather than as the result of it's having actually prevailed within science. In the exact same way creationists and IDers use popular and political pressure tactics demanding the insertion of their views despite their failure as actual science.
Ohhhhh no you don't; the ultra-liberal no God, no intelligence, no design, no debate allowed in anything algore is on your side of this debate, not ours.
Along with Chrissy-Fit Matthews and his ilk spewing spittle on the lens with his "settled science" nosensical godless liberal rants about evolution...and this is where you're getting confused...algore exclaimed "the debate is over" Hissy fit "the science is settled".
By seeking to have antievolutionism represented in textbooks and currical on the basis of intellectual affirmative action, you're only validating the methods of econuts, leftists, gratuitously aggrieved ethnic groups, and other identity groups looking to have curricula shaped in their interest.
There's projection and then there's 'this takes the cake projectionism'. Congratulations for the most obvious disconnected projection I've seen in some time!
Uhhhh....NO. Evo-cutlists ARE the liberal left. The only way this so-called theory can stand at all (and forget on it's own two feet) is via lawsuits and shutting down debate and dis-honestly misrepresenting the actual facts and of course liberals bleating 'settled science' and 'the debate is over' nonsense.
But oh no sir...the NEA, ACLU and various other nutty liberals parrot the same insane tripe and demand the rot that is evolution be indoctrinated in public schools period. Ala algore and his 'debate is over' lunacy.
NO dissent, no debate, no questioning or examining the cult is allowed.
All intellligence and design is simply not allowed!
EPIC FAIL stultis, epic fail, and I'm not sure even most liberals will buy such obvious projection!
What's next, algore and Hissy-fit are bible-thumping evangelicals? GOOD GRIEF!
Thanks for the ping!
The two movements are very much parallel in their aims.
Both anthropomorphic global warming econuts, and Darwin Derangement Syndrome antievolutionists, want the same thing. They both want textbooks and curricula to effectively lie to students about the current status of professional scientific debate.
Econuts want curricula to present the AGW view as having scientifically prevailed, when it has not; when in truth competing views about the causes and nature of global warming remain strong and viable, and have advocates producing relevant, original and ongoing research substantively advancing such views. They want this objective truth suppressed and replaced with a lie.
Antievolutionists want curricula to pretend that evolution has not prevailed in scientific debate, and to present antievolutionary views as viable scientific alternatives, when (at least to date) they are not, and when no antievolutionists are producing relevant, original and ongoing research substantively advancing such views. They want this objective truth suppressed and replaced with a lie.