I accept that you have observed and documented this process. Well done.
Did you observe and document that such was the case in the matter of the fossil we are actually discussing? If not, what proof do you offer that the process you have so observed and documented applies to this case?
By the way, whatever credentials you may possess, and I'm sure they are many and distinguished, I hereby grant a certificate of distinguished achievement in ad hominem.
Check the definition of ‘ad hominem’
When it’s the truth, it’s not.