Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Schnucki
Lamberth disagreed, saying there is no legal reason that he should "require a person who is a busy Cabinet secretary at this point to submit to an oral deposition."

The priveleged class. I guess you have protection from the law when you work for Obama.

3 posted on 07/17/2009 7:55:23 AM PDT by kidd (Obama: The triumph of hope over evidence)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: kidd

“”Lamberth disagreed, saying there is no legal reason that he should “require a person who is a busy Cabinet secretary at this point to submit to an oral deposition.””

Weren’t we counting on Lamberth last week to come up with a correct ruling in another case? I do not remember the case we discussed here. Help!

This is disappointing. If Hillary has too many responsibilities now as a Cabinet Secretary, why wasn’t this taken care of when she was a Senator? Same thing would apply, I guess. Too busy messing up the country!

This is the very first time I have ever heard the excuse that the former President Bush took all personnel files with him when he left the WH. Why would it matter anyway? The files supposedly gathered by the Clintons weren’t those of WH personnel!


6 posted on 07/17/2009 8:28:16 AM PDT by Thank You Rush
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson