Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Wolf13

It’s time for a whole bunch of “real talk” here. Though I doubt the libs will cooperate.

They seem almost angry that a pregnant lady would search her heart and choose the burden of bearing a Down’s Syndrome baby. We have genetic tests for that.

The homosexual lobby has ensured a “stop” on the same genetic tests. While the libs berated GWB his entire term for not going for their version of following “science”, they seem oddly quiet now.

So now I’d like to know how many of these moral superiors can guarantee me this: “If you knew your child would be born gay, would you bear that child?”

In other words, are you as brave, ballsy, and humane as Gov. Palin and her family?

Somehow, I suspect .................crickets.


20 posted on 07/17/2009 7:18:38 AM PDT by Daisyjane69 (Michael Reagan: "Welcome back, Dad, even if you're wearing a dress and bearing children this time)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: Daisyjane69

Sarah’s very existence gives the lie to the left’s claims of their own superior tolerance, love of diversity and inclusion, and respect for the choices of others.

She lives the kind of life they claim for themselves but to which they only give lip service.

Every time they see her or hear her voice they know they are reduced by her in any meaningful comparison.
They know their words and their lives are but hollow lies.

And they hate her for showing to themselves and the world how small and false they really are.


35 posted on 07/17/2009 7:32:45 AM PDT by Iron Munro (If you cannot be a good example you can serve as horrible warning - like Obama.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies ]

To: Daisyjane69

I’m having trouble making sense of your post. Did you say the gay lobby ensured a stop on genetic tests for Down Syndrome? Doesn’t sound right to me.

As for your hypothetical question,

““If you knew your child would be born gay, would you bear that child?”

response #1: I can’t bear children.

response #2: You have set up a hypothesis contrary to fact, so the results are not useful.


48 posted on 07/17/2009 7:49:06 AM PDT by swain_forkbeard (Rationality may not be sufficient, but it is necessary.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson