Don't you think that reprinting such an easily verified LIE casts a shadow across every other “birther” pronouncement?
Neither is this a side issue, it is the main issue under discussion thus the title of the thread.
The big zero's birth announcement was published in the paper NOT when he was one year old, but only a week or so old, just as his contemporary birth announcements on that page were around a week old.
What a joke of a blog.
You are a joke with an agenda.
Go take a nap.