The issue is disclosure. She failed to disclose a friendship and prior working relationship.
Says “possible.” If this were grounds for disqualification there wouldn’t be any courts.
It says that they have known and possibly worked with each other for decades. It doesn’t really explain the degree of the relationship—it could have been mere acquaintanceship or a casual working awareness.
Pathetic and beyond frustrating, if
the pubbie senators had this information
in time and didn’t raise it with her
during her public questioning.
I believe the hearings are over, at least
with her participation, are they not?
Thanks for the post, Kristinn.