Thats true, and is how Obama skated through the system with out being Vetted.
He was "vetted" because no farkin' republican had the stones to ask for proof. Because Juan McAmnesty rolled over, licked his atrophied testicles, presented HIS birth certificate, and then shut the h*ll up.
We are where we are now because the Dem strategy of nominating an ersatz black man, so they could claim everything was racist, worked like a charm. Because they knew the republicans had no guts, no stones, and no backbones.
The real, genuine responsible party for this whole disgusting takeover of the Republic is none other than the GOP.
All these tangents about who vets candidates and all of the other esoteric fine points are not relevant (to me anyway). The Constitution says what the qualifications are. It is up to us to see that the Constitution is upheld as the law of the land. Any bloody citizen of the United States is empowered to uphold and enforce the Constitution. The Constitution doesn't say it's OK to elect a non native born person just because no one has the stomach to ask for proof. It doesn't say the said person is retroactively legitimized because proof was not requested at a certain time.
IMHO, this is all being made much more complicated that it really is. He is, or he isn't. If he is, then we are stuck with him. If he isn't, then he should go. And if it should come down to evicting him from the WH like some deadbeat that hasn't paid the rent, well then, too bad, that is what should happen.