Skip to comments.
Did Sotomayor just commit perjury?
Posted on 07/15/2009 1:27:35 PM PDT by disraeligears
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-40, 41-49 last
To: JohnRam
That's absolutely no excuse to not run the old gal through her own mud.
No way should any Democrat be allowed to go up to the Supreme Court without first leaving a bad impression in the public mind.
41
posted on
07/15/2009 3:12:48 PM PDT
by
muawiyah
To: muawiyah
Just trying to correct the post that claimed she perjured herself. Everyone that has a modicum of knowledge on the subject knew she was on the litigation committee
42
posted on
07/15/2009 3:18:13 PM PDT
by
JohnRam
To: JohnRam
Of course she was on the litigation committee, and as top dog on the Fund's board, she knew ~ or she should have known.
I bet she wrote all the crazy stuff herself. It's that smirk of hers ~ gave her away. The woman is a head case. Too much bad insulin I'd say.
43
posted on
07/15/2009 3:24:04 PM PDT
by
muawiyah
To: Dinah Lord
PRLDF is the Puerto Rican version of the ALCU. Their goal is to reinterpret our laws to benefit Puerto Ricans. One of the issues that I recall is that the PRLDF filed a complaint about Mayor Dinkens for referring to the FALN as terrorists. The PRLDF claimed that Dinkens was insensitive and that he risked offending Puerto Ricans who thought of the FALN as a legitimate protest group.
44
posted on
07/15/2009 6:32:51 PM PDT
by
Eva
(union motto - Aim for mediocrity, it's only fair.)
To: disraeligears
Ooooo
Did she have a little tiny MELTDOWN here?
Interesting.
45
posted on
07/15/2009 6:38:27 PM PDT
by
Danae
(I AM JIM THOMPSON - Conservative does not equal Republican. Conservative does not compromise.)
To: Dinah Lord
“JUDGE SOTOMAYOR: Our mission statement was broad, like the Constitution (chuckles) ”
WTF?
No Latina, it IS NOT. It is Specific and LIMITS government, stating quite clearly what it CAN NOT DO.
This wonman should not be on any bench anywhere in any court other than as a defendant in a perjury case.
46
posted on
07/15/2009 6:42:08 PM PDT
by
Danae
(I AM JIM THOMPSON - Conservative does not equal Republican. Conservative does not compromise.)
To: Humal
If she has committed perjury, wouldnt that automatically disqualify her?Not to demoncRATs. That just solidifies their support of her.
To: Dinah Lord
And she helped raise funds for the organization, which means to me she went around REPRESENTING the fund, and it’s work! Don’t tell me she didn’t know what she was sellin, thats pure unfiltered Bull$h!t.
48
posted on
07/15/2009 6:50:39 PM PDT
by
Danae
(I AM JIM THOMPSON - Conservative does not equal Republican. Conservative does not compromise.)
To: disraeligears
In the 30 years?? Wasn’t she there for 12?
49
posted on
07/15/2009 6:52:52 PM PDT
by
Danae
(I AM JIM THOMPSON - Conservative does not equal Republican. Conservative does not compromise.)
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-40, 41-49 last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson