>>Not a single Supreme Court justice has ever admitted the personhood of the unborn.<<
Is that true? Even the dissenters in Roe?
We have only one way to establish the personhood of the unborn and that single way is through the legislature, not the judicial system. The judges hands are somewhat tied, especially now, because of past errors where people somehow believed judges made policy (kind of like Sotamayor has stated she believes). Judges apply the law, supposedly. Who makes the law? Who makes a person a person in our constitutional law? The legislature does...in effect, we do, since our legislature is supposed to be representative of us. We must get Pro-Life persons in office and get this on the ballots and let the people vote on it and make the law...make the constitutional (state and federal) amendments which includes the unborn as a person, just like we did for black persons. It baffles me that people people don't see the link. What was the reasoning for denying rights to blacks? The answer is personhood...they were some fraction (three fifths, I recall) of a person and not considered a whole person...so, we could treat them as sub-human objects. Well, it disgusts many that this occurred and it disgusts many that it occurs today for the unborn.
Regardless, it is not important what the Supreme Court justice believes in their heart or faith as far as personhood of the unborn is concerned. It is important what the law has defined to be a person, regarding Supreme Court justices.
Just like the sexually deviant are overturning traditional marriage, the Pro-Life need to overturn this legal child murder. This is beginning with one state constitution and then another. Legislate! Legislate! Legislate! These are simple facts to understand and I believe all politicians know this truth. Of all the politicians that have publically "claimed" to be pro-life, but extremely few have ever attempted to establish this personhood. The politicains who have sat back on their laurels and done nothing while claiming to be pro-life are quite dubious indeed - using votes of the pro-life voters to get in office knowing very well there could be little to nothing done on it without state and federal constitutional amendments. Look at california...their constitution has been amended 512 times and not once has the 1.5 million children muredered by their mothers every year played in their priorites....disgusting. And another fact that is disgusting is how the blacks and women can select the sexually deviant to identify and empathize with, regarding civil rights (sexuality is a behavior and there are good and bad behaviors) all the while hatefully denying civil rights to the most innocent and defenseless human persons in the world.