Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: biff

Yeah, interfering with private contracts (like the screwing over the Chrysler secured bondholders took at the hands of Obama and Rattner, who just quit) creates all kinds of questions and uncertainties.

It will raise the cost of capital, or cut it off completely, to companies experiencing financial troubles, due to fears that Obama socialists will simply void their collateral.

But for me, I wouldn’t bet on them somehow replacing a 5% mortgage with an 8%. It would be much easier to just raise taxes, stealthily, as they are doing now, IMO....


109 posted on 07/15/2009 9:40:22 AM PDT by dashing doofus (Those who are too smart to engage in politics are punished by being governed by those who are dumber)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 85 | View Replies ]


To: dashing doofus

My theory really did not have anything to do with the government raising taxes for their own coffers, but was meant to be an effort by the government to alleviate losses by the mortgage and finance companies due to inflationary pressures. 5% mortgage payments during 20% inflationary times results in lots of losses by the financial industry. Monetary value losses, not dollar quantity losses.


124 posted on 07/15/2009 2:29:43 PM PDT by biff
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 109 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson