Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: mbynack
"My point was that communications can be jammed. If that happens you can’t pre-program an air-to-air fighter to continue the mission."

I doubt seriously that communications can be jammed sufficiently to prevent control. Secure communictations is much too important to the modern high-tech battlefield to allow a potential enemy to succeed.

"I agree that they’ll take over the most dangerous manned missions someday, but we aren’t ready for them to take over the Air to Air mission yet."

And the biggest reason fot the delay is that the "fighter jocks" in the Air Force want to keep getting their "adrenaline high", not that the technology isn't available.

29 posted on 07/15/2009 12:46:22 PM PDT by Wonder Warthog ( The Hog of Steel)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 28 | View Replies ]


To: Wonder Warthog
And the biggest reason fot the delay is that the "fighter jocks" in the Air Force want to keep getting their "adrenaline high", not that the technology isn't available.

I work for a Navy Contractor doing test and evaluation on Autonomous and remote minehunting equipment. Trust me - if the stuff we're evaluating is any example of what the state of the art is, it's not ready yet. The number and types of decisions that would have to be made during an air to air engagement are staggering. It is an incredibly fluid environment. The software that we've seen couldn't handle anything near that complex.

30 posted on 07/15/2009 1:07:32 PM PDT by mbynack (Retired USAF SMSgt)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 29 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson