Since we're talking about integrity, would you support an officer who refused to go to Afghanistan in 2003 on the grounds that George W. Bush had stolen the election and therefore was not the legitimate Commander in Chief?
Since we're talking about integrity, would you support an officer who refused to go to Afghanistan in 2003 on the grounds that George W. Bush had stolen the election and therefore was not the legitimate Commander in Chief? "
Yes I would. Same circumstances - different President.
Allegations of “stolen elections” are world’s away from the likelihood that we have a constitutionally ineligible president.
One is embittered hearsay/opinion.
The other is a constitutional crisis/perversion of the electoral system.
As usual, this will end badly because our Liege Lord refuses to exhibit a cheap piece of legal paperwork.
He knows this and he knows he will never be forced to.
Pray that, if the time comes when Dear Leader turns the troops upon us, that they will refuse his command, too.