Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Support for shooter humbling, wife says(Belen NM)
KQRE ^ | 14 July, 2009 | Kim Holland

Posted on 07/14/2009 5:09:42 AM PDT by marktwain

BELEN, N.M. (KRQE) - The former Marine who contends he acted in self-defense when he killed a burglary suspect was just trying to do the right thing, his wife told News 13 Monday.

Heather Sanchez said she was in shock when she heard about the July 4 shooting. Her husband, Luke Sanchez, was arrested on an open count of murder and has since bonded out of jail.

The shooting ignited a public debate over whether Sanchez was acting as a vigilante or as a good citizen who defended himself when one of the burglars attacked him.

"I have received so many calls and letters and visits it's so overwhelming," Heather Sanchez said in an interview. "Luke and I are just humbled by how much community support we have, people I don't know, people from across the country."

Luke Sanchez told investigators he had gone out on Fourth of July evening to buy sparklers for his wife and child. But along the way he called 911 to report witnessing two men breaking into Enchantment Propane in Belen.

He followed the men's minivan. But when the van stopped Sanchez said Gary Gabaldón came at him, broke out his truck window and tried to attack him.

That's when Sanchez shot and killed Gabaldón.

The other accused burglar, Rudy Sisneros, drove away from the scene that night but turned himself in and was arrested a few days later.

Heather Sanchez said her husband, a former military police officer, is a good man "who just wanted to do the right thing."

The District Attorney Lemuel Martinez said last week he will consider Sanchez's claim of self-defense but is waiting for the investigation to be completed before deciding how to proceed with the case.


TOPICS: Crime/Corruption; Extended News; News/Current Events; US: New Mexico
KEYWORDS: banglist; belen; defense; nm
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-37 next last
They should have waited for the investigation before arresting him, charging him with murder, and requiring him to post $100,000 bond.
1 posted on 07/14/2009 5:09:43 AM PDT by marktwain
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: marktwain
They should have waited for the investigation before arresting him, charging him with murder, and requiring him to post $100,000 bond.

Exactly!

2 posted on 07/14/2009 5:14:04 AM PDT by fortheDeclaration ("Our constitution was made only for a moral and religious people".-John Adams)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: marktwain
I would like to know what evidence exists to support the murder charge.
3 posted on 07/14/2009 5:15:26 AM PDT by Niteranger68 (Have you punished an 0bama supporter today?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Niteranger68
When you track down and kill a burglar, away from the initial crime scene, you are immediately suspect.

You're put in the position of “proving” that the perp, in turn, became an imminent threat.

I believe that's clearly true in this case, but it answers your question.

4 posted on 07/14/2009 5:20:58 AM PDT by G Larry
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: marktwain

In a state that elects people like Bill Richardson, you can expect just about anything.


5 posted on 07/14/2009 5:21:47 AM PDT by lbama
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: marktwain

Belen NM is a good town, but your family name has a lot to do with how you are treated by the law.

I lived in NM for 14 years, and have friends in Belen.

NM is still a very different State.


6 posted on 07/14/2009 5:30:41 AM PDT by Texas Fossil (The last time I looked, this is still Texas where I live.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: G Larry

Not quite.

The “crime scene” was the perp attacking the man in his car. When the perp broke through the glass the man shot the perp.

If those are in fact the facts of the case, case closed.


7 posted on 07/14/2009 5:30:51 AM PDT by DB
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: G Larry

They may try to argue that he sought trouble by following the vehicle instad of merely taking down the license number and reporting it to the “authorities”.

I can almost hear that line.


8 posted on 07/14/2009 5:32:18 AM PDT by Adder (Proudly ignoring Zero since 1-20-09!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: Niteranger68
The ‘room temperature guy’ was the evidence, but I don't agree with the charge. Should have been charged after the investigation not before.
9 posted on 07/14/2009 5:34:59 AM PDT by Quick Shot
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: marktwain

I read these sorts of stories and thank the Good Lord I live in Mississippi. Our LEO, mostly, operate on COMMON SENSE. Can’t say the same for my mayor though, I’ll allow you to guess her party affiliation.

Several months ago, a 79 man heard someone breaking down his door. It was about 4 in the afternoon. He shot the guy twice with a 45, through the door. No charges were filed; the DA determined it was self defense. Seems the perp had a long record. There was no reason for him to be whacking on the old man’s door other than to break in.


10 posted on 07/14/2009 5:47:11 AM PDT by Islander7 (If you want to anger conservatives, lie to them. If you want to anger liberals, tell them the truth.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: DB

Yes “quite”!
The point I made about the reason for the murder charge is accurate.

Your point about why it is self-defense is unfortunately what the victim is in the position of having to prove.


11 posted on 07/14/2009 5:55:52 AM PDT by G Larry
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: Niteranger68

“I would like to know what evidence exists to support the murder charge.”

He’s a Marine. What other evidence do they need?


12 posted on 07/14/2009 5:56:03 AM PDT by PIF
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Adder; DB
In some states, even though Sgt. Sanchez was the victim of an unprovoked assault and was being attacked in his car, he would be required to take “reasonable and prudent” steps to avoid the assault, drive away, etc. That was the case in FL up until a few years ago.

The Make My Day law changed that.

13 posted on 07/14/2009 6:09:51 AM PDT by MindBender26 ("Ok, so I screwed up... again. I'm 65. What are they going to do, send me back to Vietnam again?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: Niteranger68
I would like to know what evidence exists to support the murder charge.

The Gabaldon's are a powerful family, Sanchez is the wrong clan. The DA Martinez had dismissed "assualting an officer" charges 3 times on the dead perp in the past.

It's a very New Mexican thing.

14 posted on 07/14/2009 6:13:26 AM PDT by Tijeras_Slim
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: marktwain

This guy is probably NOT a running away risk.
No need for bail or an arest. Just put him on notice not to leave town.


15 posted on 07/14/2009 6:18:15 AM PDT by Colvin (Harry Reid is a sap sucking idiot.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Tijeras_Slim
The Gabaldon's are a powerful family, Sanchez is the wrong clan. The DA Martinez had dismissed "assualting an officer" charges 3 times on the dead perp in the past.

I just did a search on Gabaldon and New Mexico. You aren't kidding about that. I guess it would be like shooting one of the Kennedy cousins while he's committing a crime in Massachusetts. Even if he's not a part of the main family, just the last name would bring down the law on anyone who crossed him.

16 posted on 07/14/2009 6:27:47 AM PDT by KarlInOhio (Fannie Mae, Freddie Mac, AIG, Chrysler and GM are what Marx meant by the means of production.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: KarlInOhio

That’s about the size of it.


17 posted on 07/14/2009 6:37:05 AM PDT by Tijeras_Slim
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: marktwain
It looks like a pretty clear case of self defense to me.... He didn't go looking for a fight. He was in his own property. They committed a violent act (breaking the window to "get at" him). They just picked the wrong guy to "get at." Sad that he has to be inconvenienced with pin-headed prosecutors.

We had a similar case here in Atlanta. Our prosecutors made an unusually correct decision. A handicapped 65 year old man in a van was stopped by a much younger man because of road rage. The younger man got in front of the older man's van and was threatening to drag him into the street and kill him. The Older man pulled a .357 and shot him dead through the windshield. Case closed. Guess that was the wrong old man to pick on.

18 posted on 07/14/2009 6:44:24 AM PDT by politicalmerc (NObama: more arrogant than Bill Clinton, more naive than Jimmy Carter, and more liberal than LBJ.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

Comment #19 Removed by Moderator

To: G Larry
When you track down and kill a burglar, away from the initial crime scene, you are immediately suspect.

According to the story, he followed them (completely legal) and ended up being attacked by one of them. He did not "track down and kill" the suspect.

20 posted on 07/14/2009 7:33:13 AM PDT by Niteranger68 (Have you punished an 0bama supporter today?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-37 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson