[jla]

Sarah Palin's article:

* Factual
* Insightful
* To the point
* Without hyperbole

"ha-ha-ha, I can't believe she actually mentions
God when the subject is energy!"

"She doesn't even mention a second stimulus package.
Which I am all for...as long as there are some tax cuts!"

"I can't believe she didn't fit her hero, Reagan, in there somewhere!
Hey guys, my hair look ok?"

[iopscusa]

Go Sarah, make these nanny boyz cry! Good pix of the 3 AMIGO-Goodhairs masquerading as Conservatives. Grab another donut there Senor Jeb....tools all!

[Ben Ficklin]

You say that Palin's article is factual, insightful, etc. Palins's article is also incomplete or deceptive.

She doesn't mention that cap and trade is a huge benefit to Alaska and the pipeline. Or that the final legislation will contain very significant increases in the federal loan guarantees to build the pipeline.

[9YearLurker]

Yep, while Mr. Ambition himself, Mitt Romney, supposedly likewise has credibility on business, where exactly has he been in the debate and in going after Obamaconomics?

Muted and measured and all holding back for the good of his next campaign is where he’s been. The irony of Palin’s opponents calling her a quitter is enormous.