Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Opponents of Barack Obama's presidency claim small court victory
Los Angeles Times ^ | 7/13/09 | Tami Abdollah

Posted on 07/13/2009 9:49:46 PM PDT by Smokeyblue

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-49 last
To: Smokeyblue
People don't you get it?

The real goal of all these Obama eligibility lawsuits is not to throw President Obama out of office before the 2012 presidential elections, although it would be great if just one of these lawsuits unexpectedly caused President Obama to resign.

1. To me, the true goal is to make it so uncomfortable and exhausting for Obama---as he faces lawsuit after lawsuit day after day during the final 3 years of his presidency---that Obama will have no choice but to decline to run for office again in 2012.

2. Myself, I don't have any hope that this judge will help the anti-Obama people in this lawsuit, because I don't see the Los Angeles judge doing anything different than other judges have done before him on this Obama eligibility mess: He will probably find a legal reason for dismissing the lawsuit.

3. But the judge's expected decision in favor of Obama doesn't really matter, because our goal is to keep putting pressure on Obama over and over again about this eligibility issue during the next 3 years right up to the 2012 presidential primaries and further.

4. Guess what. When Obama runs for office in the 2011-2012 right up to the Democratic Convention in 2012, he will have to run just like any other candidate who runs for President of the United States, that is, he will not have special treatment just because he happens to be President of the United States.

5.He will no doubt face question after question about where he was born and about why he won't release his college records.

6. But this second time around will much different for the community organizer-state senator than the first time he ran for president in 2008.

7. That is, he won't get a free pass as to his eligibility status.

8. For instance, there is a good chance that Obama will have to face even more and more court challenges to his eligibility status during the campaign of 2012.

9. But this time during the 2011-2012 campaign, Obama could be so EXHAUSTED from facing today's lawsuits day after day, he might NOT have any stomach or energy left to face more eligibility lawsuits if he decides to run again.

10. And if I am not mistaken, it will be Obama the private citizen who will have to fight those many eligibility lawsuits that Obama will no doubt face if he decides to run in the 2011-2012 primaries.

Again, fighting such lawsuits could cost Obama million, although I bet Obama would receive financial help from his rich democratic party friends.

11. My point is this: I believe that the Los Angeles judge will find some legal reason why he will dismiss the Obama eligibility lawsuit like the other judges before him have done.

12. But it doesn't matter, because our real objective is to keep putting pressure on Obama day after day with new lawsuits during Obama's first term over the next 3 years so that Obama will not have the energy, the finances, nor the stomach to face even more eligibility lawsuits and questions about where he was born and about his college records.

13. If I were Obama, I would be a little frightened by the thought that I will have to fight numerous lawsuits over and over again during the 2012 presidential again that question my eligibility to be President of the United States.

14. And remember, the eligibility lawsuits of the 2012 presidential campaign will be much more sophisticated than the lawsuits of today, because the lawsuits of 2012 will have learned from the mistakes of the eligibility lawsuits that will be filed during Obama's presidency of 2009-2012.

15. Again, I expect the Los Angeles judge to quickly dismiss this lawsuit like other judges have dismissed Obama eligibility lawsuits in the past.

41 posted on 07/14/2009 7:24:04 AM PDT by john mirse
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: DesertRhino
Is “Barak” a family name?

No. But "Barack" might be.

42 posted on 07/14/2009 7:30:30 AM PDT by Non-Sequitur
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 27 | View Replies]

To: john mirse; All
NEWS ALERT:

Major Cook's orders were just revoked as of 1700 hrs today. Will advise further later.

43 posted on 07/14/2009 3:38:44 PM PDT by seekthetruth ("See You In DC From 9/11 - 9/13 At Our National Freeper Tea Party Convention!")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 41 | View Replies]

Comment #44 Removed by Moderator

To: seekthetruth

Wednesday, July 15, 2009

Joining Lou in the Independent Nation on Wednesday will be Orly Taitz who represents Major Stefan Frederick Cook discusses the lawsuit brought about by her and Major Cook which questioned President Obama’s legal citizenship in the United States. Ambassador Alan Keyes, Americas Independent Party 2008 Nominee for President discusses his own lawsuit against the legal citizenship of President Obama.


45 posted on 07/15/2009 2:23:26 PM PDT by seekthetruth ("See You In DC From 9/11 - 9/13 At Our National Freeper Tea Party Convention!")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 43 | View Replies]

To: PugetSoundSoldier

Then why would he prefer to rescind orders to a soldier and potentially many more than prove it?


46 posted on 07/15/2009 2:29:25 PM PDT by Principled (Get the capital back! NRST!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 35 | View Replies]

To: Principled

I have not a clue; but the Pearson Field in Vancouver is in Vancouver, WA (on the border between Oregon and Washington), not in Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada.


47 posted on 07/15/2009 10:09:59 PM PDT by PugetSoundSoldier (Indignation over the sting of truth is the defense of the indefensible)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 46 | View Replies]

To: PugetSoundSoldier

I don’t know either, FRiend. And sorry if my previous reply seemed curt - it was unintended.

But the question remains, WHY won’t he just show it? What on earth could be worse than having the military not knowing whether to follow orders?

Did you see where a retired general and an active duty reserve lt. col. have joined the Cook case?

What will a sub cap do if ordered to fire a missile? What will be the result of such uncertainty - all to keep BO’s birth info secret?

What about his college records? Passport records?
sheesh i need sleep


48 posted on 07/15/2009 10:14:24 PM PDT by Principled (Get the capital back! NRST!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 47 | View Replies]

To: Principled

Major Cook Update:
http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/news/2294045/posts?page=22#22


49 posted on 07/16/2009 10:31:46 AM PDT by seekthetruth ("See You In DC From 9/11 - 9/13 At Our National Freeper Tea Party Convention!")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 48 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-49 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson