[GourmetDan]

"What I mean by a Geocentrist is someone that disagrees with the scientific model that the Earth moves around the Sun and thinks that this model is inferior to or at least equivalent to a model that has the Sun moving around the Earth."

As Ellis points out. There is no 'scientific' model of geokineticism, only philosophical ones.

So...using your definition, I am not a geocentrist.

"People need to be aware that there is a range of models that could explain the observations,” Ellis argues. “For instance, I can construct you a spherically symmetrical universe with Earth at its center, and you cannot disprove it based on observations.” Ellis has published a paper on this. “You can only exclude it on philosophical grounds. In my view there is absolutely nothing wrong in that. What I want to bring into the open is the fact that we are using philosophical criteria in choosing our models. A lot of cosmology tries to hide that.”

Ellis, George, in Scientific American, "Thinking Globally, Acting Universally", October 1995

[allmendream]

You most certainly ARE by my definition as you claim that the movement of the Earth, or “geokineticism”, as being at least equivalent to a model of an unmoving Earth in the quotes you provided.

Do you consider YOURSELF a geocentrist?

Do you think the Earth is in orbit around the Sun?

[ElectricStrawberry]

If it’s an equal scientific theory that the sun revolves around the Earth, how does the Earth hold the sun in its orbit through simple attractive forces when the sun has a mass 332,000+ times that of the Earth.