[GodGunsGuts]

Tell that to Allmendream, he’s the one who is still clinging to the Temple of Darwin’s long since refuted ERV arguments. And let’s not give him to much info. to start with. For some reason he wants us to educate him on his own ERV arguments before he will respond to ours. Talk about being overly careful!

[allmendream]

You also have not explained what you mean when you say that ERV’s are agents that would allow adaptation to changing environments and your other claim that only “de-evolution” or degeneration of the genome is possible.

How can you reconcile these contradictory positions?

Adaptation is degeneration?

By adapting such that a population is better suited to its environment it is worse off, degraded, de-evolving?

[CottShop]

[[let’s not give him to much info.]]

Ok- I’ll keep hush about hte fact that common design predicts common insertion points, and finding common insertion points doesn’t infact point to common ancestry as claimed. Two commonly designed creatures would of course be susceptible to similar virus’, and both species being bombarded by millions of viruses, amny of which inflict both species commonly,, one would of course expect to see soem ervs that were similar in both species- but I guess the a priori belief of commo nancestry must be protected at all cost by denying common insertion points in commonly designed creatures doesn’t point to creation commonality- only to macroevolution- I won’t point out that claiming common descent based on similar insertion points is a statement of faith, and NOT science either- I’ll keep that to myself until after AM states his position