Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: tpanther

I have two degrees in the biological sciences and I got them back in the 1960’s and 1970’s. I have NEVER - that’s NEVER - met a professional biologist who doesn’t accept evolution. They may argue about the finer points of the process but NO ONE who is a serious biologist questions the idea that organisms evolve in to new species over time.


235 posted on 07/15/2009 8:41:03 AM PDT by ZULU (God guts and guns made America great. Non nobis, non nobis Domine, sed nomini tuo da gloriam.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 234 | View Replies ]


To: ZULU

ALOT of people have BS degrees ZULU my major was biology for 3 years before I joined the Air Force.

Hardly the point. The point is evolution’s failure to progress beyond what it has already and competing ideas of intelligence and design deserve to be heard.

I’ve met journmalists who actually think they’re performing journalism. Lawyers that are doing anything and everything but following the law outside their own enrichment.

You should get out more.


238 posted on 07/15/2009 8:51:07 AM PDT by tpanther (The only thing necessary for the triumph of evil is for g!ood men to do nothing---Edmund Burke)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 235 | View Replies ]

To: ZULU

[[I have NEVER - that’s NEVER - met a professional biologist who doesn’t accept evolution.]]

Then you haven’t looked very hard- there is a petition out with over 700 signatures by scientists stating that htey dissagree with Darwinian Evolution, and htere were numerous conferences by the world’s top scientists stating that Macroevolution was impossible- but hten again, it’s all in how hard you really want to find that info- must not be very hard because there are plenty of scientists and yes, biologists, who believe Macroevolutiion is impossible- Even hte most prominent advocates for macroevolution admit the biological impossibilities associated with Macroevolution (Yet they still think there was some mechanism that somehow produced macroevolution- and htis beleief despite hte fact that macroevolution violates several absolutely key principles of science, chemistry, biology, mathematics, and the second law [and not just a few violations, but literally trillions])

Oh well- You complain about others not being ‘open minded’ but the truth is, there’s nothing about Macroevolution for which to be open minded about because it’s a closed case- it’s impossible

[[They may argue about the finer points of the process but NO ONE who is a serious biologist questions the idea that organisms evolve in to new species over time.]]

This is a lie- either out of ignorance or out of intentional deceit


255 posted on 07/15/2009 12:29:55 PM PDT by CottShop (Scientific belief does not constitute scientific evidence, nor does it convey scientific knowledge)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 235 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson