Your argument is a straw man.
The evolutionary theory does not address the origins of life, it only shows how life has changed since it inception. This is an often-repeated misconception.
Science does not address things outside of the physical world because they are not testable, or repeatable so they cannot be falsified. If it cannot be falsified then it is not Science.
It is surprising with the degrees you have that you did not know this.
That is the explaination I expect from you.
The evolutionary theory does not address the origins of life, it only shows how life has changed since it inception. This is an often-repeated misconception.
Please show me where I asked you to explain origin. Although it seems reasonable to begin at the beginning,....i.e.how did the first cell evolve.I did not ask you or Zulu that question. I asked how conciousness, sentience, logic, reason sprung forth from covalent bonds in an evolved biological system?
Science does not address things outside of the physical world because they are not testable, or repeatable so they cannot be falsified. If it cannot be falsified then it is not Science.
This is the only honest statement you have made to be. I agree. Youradmission that science stops at that word you detest...the moment of creation, requires a transcendent being. That is moment of creation which the scientific materialist cannot possibly hope to examine. Perhaps you are one who denies the Law of Causality.
It is surprising with the degrees you have that you did not know this.
Your derision humors me. I will leave your opprobruium with you to consider. It means nothing to me.
The evolutionary theory does not address the origins of life, it only shows how life has changed since it inception. This is an often-repeated misconception.
Science does not address things outside of the physical world because they are not testable, or repeatable so they cannot be falsified. If it cannot be falsified then it is not Science.
It is surprising with the degrees you have that you did not know this.
Wow, where do I begin?
It seems the liberal indoctrination centers can't even get their subjects on the same page. Perhaps a view of Evolution 101 at the liberal Bezerkley University out in Cesspoolifornication will enlighten you...origins is plainly addressed.
Then we move onto what is or isn't science, as if someone, somehow, sometime gave liberals the keys to science in the first place.
We have string theory, multiverse theory and scientists studying the effects of prayer of all things, on the tax-payer dime no less...and you parrot that science isn't science unless it's testable and falisfiable and observable?
Liberals always make rules they never intend to abide by themselves.
Now that I think about it, this makes me wonder, speaking of all the degrees he has, it seems to me the Gallup poll allmendream linked sure seems a bit peculiar with all the scientists on dissentfromdarwin.org, FR, etc. etc. etc.