To: grizzlyfish
“Why not just cut to the chase and appoint Mr. Rogers?”
cuz he’s dead.
5 posted on
07/13/2009 9:55:57 AM PDT by
rockinqsranch
(Dems, Libs, Socialists...Call 'em What you Will, They ALL have Fairies Living In Their Trees.)
To: rockinqsranch
When did simple death stop a good democrat? Just another obstacle to overcome, and they do!
6 posted on
07/13/2009 9:57:51 AM PDT by
dcwusmc
(We need to make government so small that it can be drowned in a bathtub.)
To: rockinqsranch
cuz hes dead. So now he can not serve, only vote...
8 posted on
07/13/2009 9:58:35 AM PDT by
TLI
( ITINERIS IMPENDEO VALHALLA)
To: rockinqsranch
Why not just cut to the chase and appoint Mr. Rogers? cuz hes dead.
..and that's the problem! Mr. Rogers would be a reliable advocate for the leftist dems policies.
11 posted on
07/13/2009 9:59:54 AM PDT by
Islander7
(If you want to anger conservatives, lie to them. If you want to anger liberals, tell them the truth.)
To: rockinqsranch
Why not just cut to the chase and appoint Mr. Rogers?This is truly an insult to Fred Rogers. He was graduated from Dartmouth and also theological seminary (natural law); he was awarded more than 40 honorary degrees in his life for his pioneering broadcasting methods of educating children. Given that today's dependency culture acts like children, had Fred Rogers served in our courts, he would have stood head and shoulders over Sotomayor or any DemoMarxist infiltrating our judiciary through identity politics.
20 posted on
07/13/2009 10:28:56 AM PDT by
Albion Wilde
(If ten percent is good enough for Jesus, it ought to be good enough for Uncle Sam. --Ray Stevens)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson