Unless he posted a reply in the last couple minutes, Chris Parry has so far not denied that:
a) He either wrote and posted some or all of the racist posts under discussion,
b) He was cooperating with those who wrote and posted them, or,
c) He knew the racist posts were plants all along.
And it would be unusual for Parry to give his non-denial denial on a FR thread, and then not follow the subsequent posts.
But in case he missed it, here are original questions (including the original grammatical mistakes) - and others, of course, may keep asking these same questions. If Parry still refuses to answer, we may draw our own conclusions.
__________________________
First, I dont have the means right now to determine whether the screen-name Chris Parry = the Chris Parry were talking about, but I assume that can be determined quickly enough.
If you are, please answer this:
1) Do you specifically deny that the any of racist comments under discussion were made by either:
a)yourself,
b)someone you were cooperating with, or
c)someone you had reason to know to be a plant intended to damage Freerepublic.com?
2) Have you ever made comments on the Internet, with the intention of spoofing and thereby damaging those with whom you disagree?
You forthright answers may help to resolve this controversy.
Thanks.
Well, any suggestion I posted the comments is not just wrong, it’s nuts. Your own posters here have admitted to posting them, and there were dozens.
As for the ‘advocating racial attacks’, the post you refer to is exactly the opposite. It was bemoaning that African-Americans were being abandoned during Hurricane Katrina and after.
“Blaming Republicans” refers to blaming them for losing New Orleans.
It’s really the sort of thing that you have to actively work hard not to get, if you read the diary and threads before it.