Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

It is STILL bubbling!
1 posted on 07/11/2009 1:56:30 PM PDT by abb
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies ]


To: 04-Bravo; aimhigh; andyandval; Arizona Carolyn; backhoe; Bahbah; bert; bilhosty; Caipirabob; ...

ping


2 posted on 07/11/2009 1:58:13 PM PDT by abb ("What ISN'T in the news is often more important than what IS." Ed Biersmith, 1942 -)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: abb
The only 'flaw' in the plan was that it became a matter of public knowledge.
3 posted on 07/11/2009 1:59:57 PM PDT by YHAOS
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: abb

where are the indictments?


4 posted on 07/11/2009 2:00:58 PM PDT by browniexyz
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: abb

Ethical lapse my you know what. These guys are real losers.


7 posted on 07/11/2009 2:13:38 PM PDT by freekitty (Give me back my conservative vote.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: abb
Publisher Katharine Weymouth and Executive Editor Marcus Brauchli have now taken full responsibility

No, "full responsibility" would entail resigning.

They've only said, "Whoops, my bad."

9 posted on 07/11/2009 2:20:13 PM PDT by martin_fierro (< |:)~)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: abb
"As of late this week, only two Post readers cited the controversy as a reason for canceling their subscription. Only about 50 readers had written critical letters to the editor, about half the number The Post typically receives on a controversial topic."

Which tells us that the Post finally lost its last two subscribers with any common sense, basic intelligence or moral conviction.

The few remaining Post readers are hopelessly dimwitted, babbling fools who actually think they've "won".

10 posted on 07/11/2009 2:20:14 PM PDT by justkate
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: abb
Neither Weymouth nor Brauchli can recall anyone raising concerns, although both say they wish someone had.

Well, they're in luck. Next time they come up with some unethical harebrained scheme, the whole newsroom will stand up and tell them...in unison.

11 posted on 07/11/2009 2:23:32 PM PDT by GOPJ ( Obama Administration: Soft & Sweet with Enemies. Tough & Unfair with Friends.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: abb
The Washington Post's ill-fated plan to sell sponsorships of off-the-record "salons" was an ethical lapse of monumental proportions.

Does journalism really have a code of ethics? You know, like doctors, lawyers, engineers and CPA's do? A code which is clearly stated and constantly enforced? One which requires you to take periodic continuing professional education courses and requires you to pass tests on your knowledge of the rules and your handling of various situations? One where you can lose your license and face civil and/or criminal prosecution for violating its tenets?

Or is this more made-up bullcrap from a craft pretending to be a profession?

13 posted on 07/11/2009 2:33:01 PM PDT by Zakeet (Obama: Always wrong, never in doubt.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: abb

“Publisher Katharine Weymouth and Executive Editor Marcus Brauchli have now taken full responsibility...”
.
What does that mean?


15 posted on 07/11/2009 2:49:05 PM PDT by 353FMG (Death is Life without Freedom.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: abb
"Several now say they didn't speak up because they assumed top managers would eventually ensure that traditional ethics boundaries would not be breached."

lolololololololololololololololololol

16 posted on 07/11/2009 2:52:33 PM PDT by Psycho_Bunny (ALSO SPRACH ZEROTHUSTRA)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: abb

“Publisher Katharine Weymouth and Executive Editor Marcus Brauchli have now taken full responsibility...”

When did they resign? That is “full responsibility”. This,on the other hand, is little more than token hand wringing.


19 posted on 07/11/2009 3:20:41 PM PDT by rod1
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: abb

Who were these lawmakers, administration officials, think tank experts, business leaders and heads of associations? What was their cut going to be?

Sounds like an influence prostitution ring to me, with WaPo as the pimp.


21 posted on 07/11/2009 3:33:50 PM PDT by ptgustan (Marxist thought stinks on ice.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson