Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: MHGinTN

That is not an acceptable reply to my question.


122 posted on 07/11/2009 9:06:46 AM PDT by verity ("Lord, what fools we mortals be!")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 112 | View Replies ]


To: verity
The following is presented early on as axiomatic in his 1/17/08 speech. Think of how this notion is now being implimented with the recently passed cap and tax bill:
"We need a price on greenhouse gas emissions in order to motivate reaching higher into the tree, and we need research and development to bring more fruit into reach. And the final key point is that the United States has to switch from being a laggard in addressing this problem to being a leader, and we need to switch sooner rather than later if the world as a whole is to act in time to avoid catastrophic interference in the climate system."

I'm not going to do all your homework for you to answer your generic question. You will have to think, not just play contrarian.

124 posted on 07/11/2009 9:10:46 AM PDT by MHGinTN (Believing they cannot be deceived, they cannot be convinced when they are deceived.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 122 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson