Replies

To: Erik Latranyi

That is not what is alleged. The English photographer told the Times they were not digitally altered, and they believed him, but it turns out that they were.

5 posted on 07/10/2009 8:11:40 AM PDT by proxy_user

[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies ]

To: proxy_user

The English photographer told the Times they were not digitally altered, and they believed him, but it turns out that they were.

Does anyone know if the Photos were DIGITALLY TAKEN? I.E. No Film?

7 posted on 07/10/2009 8:13:46 AM PDT by sr4402

[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies ]

To: proxy_user

The English photographer told the Times they were not digitally altered, and they believed him

Ignorance is no defense.

8 posted on 07/10/2009 8:14:22 AM PDT by Puppage (You may disagree with what I have to say, but I shall defend to your death my right to say it)

[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search

News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794