Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


1 posted on 07/10/2009 8:06:55 AM PDT by Dallas59
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies ]


To: Dallas59

2 posted on 07/10/2009 8:08:37 AM PDT by Dallas59 ("You know the one with the big ears? He might be yours, but he ain't my president.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Dallas59

The New York Times would NEVER alter the news to suit their needs!

/sarc


3 posted on 07/10/2009 8:09:10 AM PDT by Erik Latranyi (Too many conservatives urge retreat when the war of politics doesn't go their way.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Dallas59

Interesting that the Times didn’t have the expertise to vet the photos on their own.


4 posted on 07/10/2009 8:10:12 AM PDT by NativeNewYorker (Freepin' Jew Boy)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Dallas59

If I had paid for this story....Would the NYT refund my money?


9 posted on 07/10/2009 8:14:33 AM PDT by Dallas59 ("You know the one with the big ears? He might be yours, but he ain't my president.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Dallas59

No thanks. I wouldn’t pay any amount of money to read this rag.


11 posted on 07/10/2009 8:18:57 AM PDT by freekitty (Give me back my conservative vote.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Dallas59
""Had the editors known that the photographs had been digitally manipulated, they would not have published the picture essay," the editors note says." . . .

. . . but, since the pics fits the editors' template, they were easily fooled.

13 posted on 07/10/2009 8:23:03 AM PDT by YHAOS
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Dallas59
The fox piece got it wrong. It should say
inadvertently got caught publishing digitally manipulated photographs
I doubt they mind publishing manipulated images but they do mind when someone finds out.
16 posted on 07/10/2009 8:47:27 AM PDT by LostPassword
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Dallas59
The photos showed run-down housing construction projects

At first, I thought the article was about public housing projects, but after digging some, I find it was about McMansions.

21 posted on 07/10/2009 9:14:38 AM PDT by razorback-bert (We used to call them astronomical numbers. Now we should call them economical numbers.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Dallas59
"Had the editors known that the photographs had been digitally manipulated, they would not have published the picture essay," the editors note says.

In other words, "Let's do the nasty deed and then apologize for it later."

26 posted on 07/10/2009 10:41:03 AM PDT by upchuck (Psalm 109:8 ~ Let his days be few; and let another take his office.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson