The elections are in LATE 2010 (November 2, 2010)...handover of power is early 2011. If she left in 2010, it would of been the same gripes and complaints from the anklebiters. She would then have to form an exploritory committees, form contacts, and do all the things she has to do if she’s wants to move on to other things
Meanwhile, her legal bills from bogus complaints continue and her reputation gets smeared. It would leave her with little time for 2012 (or anything else). Mittens and Huckster are free to go about.
Even if isn’t a run for 2012, she couldn’t get the job done because of stonewalling and bogus ethics complaints (they are even recycling the SAME complaints now) which costs the filers NOTHING. Alaskan citizens were getting caught in the middle of a political snipe hunt while getting pegged with the administrative costs.
Did you even read my last post?
What a load of crap. You’re either playing coy, dumb, supporting another horse in the race, live in a sanitized world or can’t see the buzz she generates. If she didn’t have that ability, her rivals wouldn’t be trying to DESTROY her with Alinsky tactics!
Already, Iowa and New Hampshire GOP groups want Sarah to vist their states. They accept her reasons for resigning and want her to speak at their functions.
No matter her choice, the game’s afoot. She’s free now.
[-—————————————————]
[When Sarah twitters....the libs get embittered.]
[-—————————————————]
‘If she didnt have that ability, her rivals wouldnt be trying to DESTROY her with Alinsky tactics!’
I haven’t seen Palin give a speech( apart from the Republican convention) which shows that she has the intellectual ability to promote conservatism.
It is early days yet and the first speech she is going to give in Simi valley will point to what she can achieve.
Reagan did it with years of radio broadcasts, essays, speeches to party activists , conventions etc... it is just early to comment on Palin’s ability.