Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

'Myths, Illusions, and Peace'
IMRa/New York Times ^ | July 8, 2009 | DENNIS ROSS and DAVID MAKOVSKY

Posted on 07/09/2009 5:34:21 AM PDT by SJackson

Edited on 07/09/2009 5:52:19 AM PDT by Admin Moderator. [history]

Linkage: The Mother of all Myths

Of all the policy myths that have kept us from making real progress in the Middle East, one stands out for its impact and longevity: the idea that if only the Palestinian conflict were solved, all the other Middle East conflicts would melt away. This is the argument of "linkage."

Neoconservatives have always rejected it, given their skepticism about Arab intentions and their related belief that the Israeli-Palestinian conflict cannot be resolved. While realists have been the most determined purveyors, this myth transcends all others and has had amazing staying power here, internationally, and in the Middle East. In fact, few ideas have been as consistently and forcefully promoted - by laymen, policymakers, and leaders alike.

One need not look too far for examples of linkage's pervasiveness. Note the words of Egyptian president Hosni Mubarak in early 2008 when, standing next to George W. Bush at a joint press conference following their talks in the Sinai resort town of Sharm al-Sheikh, he recounted their conversation: "I emphasize that the Palestinian question, of course, is the core of problems and conflict in the Middle East, and it is the entry to contain the crisis and tension in the region, and the best means to face what's going on in the world, our region - I mean by that, the escalation of violence, extremism and terrorism."

King Abdullah of Jordan made much the same argument during an interview with an American television network in 2006: "I keep saying Palestine is the core. It is linked to the extent of what's going on in Iraq. It is linked to what's going on in Lebanon."


TOPICS: Editorial; Israel; Politics/Elections
KEYWORDS:

1 posted on 07/09/2009 5:34:21 AM PDT by SJackson
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: dennisw; Cachelot; Nix 2; veronica; Catspaw; knighthawk; Alouette; Optimist; weikel; Lent; GregB; ..
Middle East and terrorism, occasional political and Jewish issues Ping List. High Volume

If you’d like to be on or off, please FR mail me.

..................

Dennis should tell his boss the facts of life. He hasn't absorbed them despite his experience immersed in Muslim culture

2 posted on 07/09/2009 5:38:08 AM PDT by SJackson (the number-one job facing the middle class...a three-letter word: jobs. J-O-B-S. Jobs)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SJackson
[this myth transcends all others and has had amazing staying power here, internationally, and in the Middle East. In fact, few ideas have been as consistently and forcefully promoted - by laymen, policymakers, and leaders alike.]

This myth will continue to be propagated as God Himself brings the nations of the world to war against His only begotten Son Jesus Christ where Jesus Christ Himself will destroy them on the hills of Zion at the end of the 7 year ordained tribulation as the Scriptures plainly teach us who believe the Scripture only. All the unbelieving nations and peoples will go, they are marked by their hatred of Christ and of His Israel and they also hate bible believing Christians as sure as their master, the evil angel Lucifer, who also hates and intends to destroy Israel and Bible believing Christians and he uses the useful idiots of the world a.k.a., leftists, communists and secular humanists and false religionists as his pawns.
Search the Scriptures and save yourselves from this present evil generation.

3 posted on 07/09/2009 6:32:56 AM PDT by kindred (Blessed be the LORD out of Zion, which dwelleth at Jerusalem... Ps.135:20)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SJackson

Your link is not working.

Here is a link to a NY Times review by Howard French of the Ross/Makovsky book. Quelle suprise! It is a negative review calling the book unbalanced in favor of Israel. Because the NYT firmly believes that terrorists and the only free democracy in the region must be treated equally. After all their children are NOT sleeping in Sderot.

http://www.nytimes.com/2009/07/08/books/08french.html?ref=books


4 posted on 07/09/2009 8:16:49 AM PDT by dervish (I never saw a wild thing sorry for itself)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson