Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Movieguide® Asks Local Gov't Officials To Stop Local Screenings of ‘Pornographic' ‘Brüno' Movie
Movieguide ^ | Ted Baehr

Posted on 07/08/2009 11:14:42 PM PDT by Cedar

Our organization has just viewed the upcoming “R-rated” movie “Brüno,” which is scheduled to come out in local movie theaters Friday, July 10. Having attended a screening of the movie, we can factually state that the movie contains the following obscene, pornographic and offensive material (and more besides):

• Extremely graphic sex scenes (including depicted heterosexual intercourse, depicted oral sex (including anal licking), depicted homosexual sodomy, and sadomasochistic whipping of a homosexual in his bikini briefs by a fully nude female “Dominatrix”); • Scenes of full frontal male and female nudity (including extended close-ups of a man swinging his fully nude penis) • A mocking, sexually explicit interview with a pastor who specializes in “making gay people straight” that is clearly intended to provoke the pastor by crudely offending him in a vulgar manner; • Adopting an African child as a fashion accessory and “man magnet” to be “in” with American culture like Madonna and Angelina Jolie (then shipping that baby – whom the protagonist names “OJ” – on a plane through checked baggage in a cardboard box); • Images of a black baby from Africa in a hot tub with white adults who are clearly interested in performing sex acts at some point with one another; • Making light of the Holocaust and Jews, including mentioning Adolph Hitler in a positive light and a homosexualized outfit mocking traditional Jewish dress; • A sequence mocking African Americans and black people; and, • Explicit verbal descriptions of sex acts.

Regardless of your views on sexuality, or your definition of humor, one thing is clear: the content of this movie should not be seen by children of any age, including underage teenagers. Originally rated NC-17, “Brüno” has since been given an R rating. An R rating simply suggests that theaters restrict viewing by children under 17 unless they are with an adult. However, Federal Trade Commission studies have shown that almost half of movie theaters do not enforce the Motion Picture Associations restrictions, and that one-third of unaccompanied 13-year-olds have purchased tickets for an R-rated movie. Additionally, many children sneak into R-rated movies or get tickets from some sick adult who finds it humorous to flood an impressionable child’s mind with obscene content. Clearly, however, “Brüno” still contains NC-17 content as well as pornographic content.

With this reality in mind, we formally ask your City Council to file an injunction against the showing of this movie in your city, or at least restrict the film to 17 and over regardless of adult accompaniment. To determine whether this movie fits the community standards of your locality, as legally defined by the United States Supreme Court, you may have to require your local movie theaters to screen the movie ahead of time for the Council, or a duly designated committee of the Council, to determine what formal action to take regarding “Brüno.”

Please let us know if there is something we can do to help you in this battle for our children.

Sincerely,

Ted Baehr, Juris Doctor Publisher of Movieguide®


TOPICS: Culture/Society; Extended News; Miscellaneous; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: bruno; filth; hollywood; homosexualagenda; movieguide; moviereview; nc17; pornography; tedbaehr
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 121-132 next last
Here's the article at the link:

Movieguide® has sent a letter asking local government officials throughout the U.S. to consider stopping the screening of the controversial movie "Brüno" starring comedian Sacha Baron Cohen, Movieguide® Publisher Dr. Ted Baehr announced today.

In the letter, Movieguide® asks officials to get an injunction against screening the movie on Friday until officials can look at the movie and determine whether it should be banned because it does not fit the "community standards" in their area, as defined by U.S. Supreme Court rulings on obscenity and pornography.

"This movie has been cut to get an R rating," Dr. Baehr said, "but it still contains much pornographic, offensive content."

Among the "pornographic" content in the movie, according to Movieguide® and Dr. Baehr, are "extremely graphic" sex scenes, including depicted intercourse, depicted homosexual sodomy, a depicted orgy, and depicted oral sex (including anal licking); explicit shots, including extensive close-ups, of full male and female nudity; and, "obscene" language about sex acts.

"The movie also contains scenes mocking Jews, African Americans and Christian evangelicals," Dr. Baehr said.

He noted that a 2000 Federal Trade Commission study showed that nearly half of all movie theaters in the U.S. actually sell tickets to children and underage teenagers trying to get into an R-rated movie by themselves, without an adult.

"Supreme Court rulings on obscenity allow local, state and federal governments to ban such movies like ‘Brüno,' or at least restrict them to 17 and over regardless of adult accompaniment," Dr. Baehr added.

"Government has a duty to protect the community, especially vulnerable children and underage teenagers, from this kind of pornographic material," he concluded.

Dr. Baehr is chairman of the Christian Film & Television Commission® (CFTVC) ministry which publishes Movieguide®, CFTVC's family guide to movies and entertainment. CFTVC and Movieguide® are an international non-profit ministry dedicated to "redeeming the values of the entertainment industry by influencing industry executives and by informing and equipping the public about the influence of the entertainment media."

1 posted on 07/08/2009 11:14:42 PM PDT by Cedar
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: Cedar

I’ll tell you what you can do with your First Amendment...


2 posted on 07/08/2009 11:18:27 PM PDT by Rodebrecht (What are you and who do you want?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Rodebrecht

No doubt. Censorship isn’t the answer. Ask Tipper Gore.


3 posted on 07/08/2009 11:20:55 PM PDT by Carling ("We've lost two people in my family because you dickheads won't cut trees down," - Warwick Spooner)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Rodebrecht
• Images of a black baby from Africa in a hot tub with white adults who are clearly interested in performing sex acts at some point with one another

This is child pornography and not free speech.

Sacha Baron Cohen should whack himself.

4 posted on 07/08/2009 11:21:42 PM PDT by SolidWood (Sarah Palin: "Only dead fish go with the flow!")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Rodebrecht

Yeah, I’m sure the Founding Fathers meant for explicit pornography to be shown everywhere..../sarc


5 posted on 07/08/2009 11:22:14 PM PDT by Cedar
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Carling

Didn’t Frank Zappa write a song about her silly antics?


6 posted on 07/08/2009 11:22:47 PM PDT by Rodebrecht (What are you and who do you want?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Cedar

My guess is that citizens will not be forced at gunpoint to march into theaters to watch this movie.

That being the case, the government should not prohibit adults from voluntarily seeing Bruno.


7 posted on 07/08/2009 11:23:56 PM PDT by trumandogz (The Democrats are driving us to Socialism at 100 MPH -The GOP is driving us to Socialism at 97.5 MPH)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Cedar
However, Federal Trade Commission studies have shown that almost half of movie theaters do not enforce the Motion Picture Associations restrictions,

In that case how is changing the rating going to matter?

How about some parental responsibility?

8 posted on 07/08/2009 11:24:46 PM PDT by Hugin (GSA! (Goodbye sweet America))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: trumandogz

The author’s concern here is for children (who easily get in to see movies).


9 posted on 07/08/2009 11:25:22 PM PDT by Cedar
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: Cedar

Seems like bad parenting, doesn’t it?


10 posted on 07/08/2009 11:27:15 PM PDT by Carling ("We've lost two people in my family because you dickheads won't cut trees down," - Warwick Spooner)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: Cedar
The author’s concern here is for children

Oh yes, I forgot. It is always for the Children!

However if that is the case, why did the writer pen the following?

With this reality in mind, we formally ask your City Council to file an injunction against the showing of this movie in your city...

11 posted on 07/08/2009 11:30:06 PM PDT by trumandogz (The Democrats are driving us to Socialism at 100 MPH -The GOP is driving us to Socialism at 97.5 MPH)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: Carling

I don’t know. How many good parents have children who sneak into bad movies? It happens.

This movie apparently is exceedingly pornographic and should have strong restrictions.

From the description of it, I think most people would agree.


12 posted on 07/08/2009 11:31:14 PM PDT by Cedar
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: SolidWood
Under federal law (18 U.S.C. §2256), child pornography1 is defined as any visual depiction, including any photograph, film, video, picture, or computer or computer-generated image or picture, whether made or produced by electronic, mechanical, or other means, of sexually explicit conduct, where

* the production of the visual depiction involves the use of a minor engaging in sexually explicit conduct; or

* the visual depiction is a digital image, computer image, or computer-generated image that is, or is indistinguishable from, that of a minor engaging in sexually explicit conduct; or

* the visual depiction has been created, adapted, or modified to appear that an identifiable minor is engaging in sexually explicit conduct.

Federal law (18 U.S.C. §1466A) also criminalizes knowingly producing, distributing, receiving, or possessing with intent to distribute, a visual depiction of any kind, including a drawing, cartoon, sculpture or painting, that
* depicts a minor engaging in sexually explicit conduct and is obscene, or

* depicts an image that is, or appears to be, of a minor engaging in graphic bestiality, sadistic or masochistic abuse, or sexual intercourse, including genital-genital, oral-genital, anal-genital, or oral-anal, whether between persons of the same or opposite sex and such depiction lacks serious literary, artistic, political, or scientific value.

Sexually explicit conduct is defined under federal law (18 U.S.C. §2256) as actual or simulated sexual intercourse (including genital-genital, oral-genital, anal-genital, or oral-anal, whether between persons of the same or opposite sex), bestiality, masturbation, sadistic or masochistic abuse, or lascivious exhibition of the genitals or pubic area of any person.

missingkids.com
13 posted on 07/08/2009 11:31:35 PM PDT by Rodebrecht (What are you and who do you want?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: trumandogz

Hey listen, go see the filth if you want to. But if someone wants to complain about pornographic film possibly available to children, I’m glad they are complaining.


14 posted on 07/08/2009 11:34:13 PM PDT by Cedar
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: Cedar

Well, good parenting should be able to offset anything the kids will see in a two hour film. This is still a FREE REPUBLIC, right?


15 posted on 07/08/2009 11:34:14 PM PDT by Carling ("We've lost two people in my family because you dickheads won't cut trees down," - Warwick Spooner)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: Cedar

I’m glad they are complaining as well. That doesn’t mean I think the film should be banned.


16 posted on 07/08/2009 11:35:17 PM PDT by Carling ("We've lost two people in my family because you dickheads won't cut trees down," - Warwick Spooner)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: Carling

“we formally ask your City Council to file an injunction against the showing of this movie in your city, OR AT LEAST restrict the film to 17 and over regardless of adult accompaniment. To determine whether this movie fits the community standards of your locality, as legally defined by the United States Supreme Court...”


17 posted on 07/08/2009 11:39:05 PM PDT by Cedar
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: Cedar
Hey listen, go see the filth if you want to.

Why thank you, Mr. First Amendment! Without your permission to view a movie of my choosing, it would be like I lived in Red China or Iran.

But if someone wants to complain about pornographic film possibly available to children, I’m glad they are complaining.

And yes, the people that are complaining about the movie are not only exercising their First Amendment Rights, but they are also effectively working as a PR Machine and free advertising for the movie Bruno.

I am sure Sacha Baron Cohen very much appreciates your effort to promote his movie.

18 posted on 07/08/2009 11:41:28 PM PDT by trumandogz (The Democrats are driving us to Socialism at 100 MPH -The GOP is driving us to Socialism at 97.5 MPH)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: trumandogz

Only the real perverts would want to see this movie after reading the article.


19 posted on 07/08/2009 11:43:35 PM PDT by Cedar
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]

To: Cedar
Review: It's great. Oh waiting, I've mistaken crudity for art. I've mistaken porno for the sublime. I've mistaken cruelty for humour. How did that happen?
20 posted on 07/08/2009 11:45:26 PM PDT by Blind Eye Jones
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 121-132 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson