Posted on 07/08/2009 7:43:15 PM PDT by 2ndDivisionVet
Good assummption, as in any event she would be term-limited to 2014
i think you’re talking apples & oranges. No, not like chosen1; the rules as they are applied to republicans do not apply to dhimmicrats.
But there is no denying the second part of your statement; dhimmicrat/marxists do still set the tone and the playing field, and current batch of pubbies only too happily play by these rules, usually to their diminishment.
JG
That bold picture causes one to stop and think. What choice does a woman voter really have? They tend to vote more liberal because they are looking for someone to give them protection, while supporting their ability to move ahead, minimizing the gender issues.
I am one that thinks Sarah must get out there and educate the public on general core conservative principles and values. Sarah has proven herself as a capable executive and speaker (no gender issue here for her)
Sarah needs to give history lessons on where our country came from and where we are going.
I don't know much about Michelle Bachmann, but have heard some of your views.
If Sarah could establish herself with tremendous credibility with the common voter, then an all-female ticket would be the largest history maker in presidential politics.
If J.C. Watts had to think twice whether he would pull the lever for BHO, then consider women voters given the opportunity for place, not one, but two women into our executive office.
I want Steve Forbes at Tresury
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.