Not misleading at all. The excerpts above clearly state this.
The point is she had this perception and still supported abortion prior to the 1980 Harris ruling.
She obviously and quite clearly states she is pro-abortion, and frets over accessibility. However, the WND snippets seem designed to imply she favors eugenics when it seems that that was her perception of the ruling, not necessarily her personal opinion regards legalized abortion.
But she is just like the rest of the feminist libs. The Left doesn’t get it when Sarah Palin says it’s about country, and people like Ginsburg don’t get it when we say it’s about life. They are all about personhood but cannot make the connection to life.