Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Squidpup; PreciousLiberty

Probably just another imaginary “ghost spot” hyped from NASA as usual.


86 posted on 07/07/2009 6:00:54 PM PDT by steveo
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: steveo
"Probably just another imaginary “ghost spot” hyped from NASA as usual."

No, this is the real deal, though its size may be a sign of strange solar happenings. I'm reminded of the NSO paper predicting no visible sunspots by 2015, as the cores are getting warmer. The same paper said the magnetic fields are getting less intense, which makes the spots larger.

The other thing that's far from normal is the solar wind, which is still running only a little over 300 KPS, where 600 used to be the norm. That effects cosmic ray incidence on the Earth.

The Maunder Minimum wasn't completely spotless, especially at the beginning (~1600-1650). I find it amusing that we're being reassured that "it's very unlikely" this is a Maunder style minimum, when astronomers have no idea what caused the first one...


103 posted on 07/08/2009 5:57:29 AM PDT by PreciousLiberty
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 86 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson